The Non-Binary Runner Phenomenon

“However, for me, as a lifelong runner who has logged 10,000 miles on American roads in the past 10 years and who has competed in dozens of races from the 5K to the marathon since 2004, I disagree with Fedorowski. Adding a non-binary category to road racing is misguided and counterproductive.”

As Maine’s Governor, Janet Mills, battles the United States Department of Justice over the inclusion of biological boys in girls’ sports, another development in the cultural battle over identity has flown comparatively under the radar: the establishment of a third gender category in American long-distance running. In recent years, organizers of more than 200 road races have now included a “non-binary” option in addition to the traditional male/female divisions.

“For those who are not cisgender, competing in an environment that does not affirm their identity is not only a safety concern, but also adds unnecessary anxiety and pressure, which detracts from the participant’s overall ability to fulfill their personal and competitive goals.” So writes Jake Fedorowski in The Guide to Non-Binary Inclusion in Running in support of this extra category.

However, for me, as a lifelong runner who has logged 10,000 miles on American roads in the past 10 years and who has competed in dozens of races from the 5K to the marathon since 2004, I disagree with Fedorowski. Adding a non-binary category to road racing is misguided and counterproductive.

No one is thinking about gender while you run a race. It is not written on your bib, and it has no bearing on your performance. Gender, in fact, is like the color of your undergarments. It is not visible to the public and does not impact strength, speed, endurance, or mental toughness. Participants in road races run together at the same time in a mass start—one big enthusiastic and supportive throng—and are not distinguishable by gender.